Characteristics analysis of integrated science question items with the rasch model
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the characteristics of the Integrated Science question item. This is quantitative descriptive research. The research subjects were 90 students of class VIII Junior High School in the high, medium, and low categories in Surakarta City. The characteristics of the items were analyzed using the Winstep program with the Rasch Model. Based on data analysis, the results obtained are: 1) the validity of conformity level of the items is valid; 2) the reliability value of the students was 0,79 which was sufficient, the reliability of the items was 0,93 which was very good, and the reliability between the students and the items (Alpha Cronbach) was 0,81 which was very good; 3) the value of separation item > value separation of students; 4) the distribution of the difficulty level of the questions is generally in the medium category; and 5) the difference power of the questions in the very good category is 35%, 25% in the good, 30% in the moderate, and 10% in the unable to distinguish category. Thus, it can be concluded that the analysis of the characteristics of the Integrated Science question items using the Rasch Model is considered good.
References
Andersen, E. B. (1973). A goodness of fit test for the rasch model. Psychometrika, 38(1), pp. 123–140.
Arikunto, S. (2012). Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
BNSP. (2009). Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia nomor 19 tahun 2005 tentang standar nasional pendidikan. Departemen Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia.
Curtis, D. D., & Boman, P. (2007). X-Ray Your Data with Rasch. International Education Journal, 8(2), 249-259.
Fisher, A. G. (1993). The assessment of IADL motor skills: an application of many-faceted Rasch analysis. American Jornal of Occupational Therapy, 47(4), pp. 319–329.
Indrawan, D., & Jalilah, S. R. (2021). Metode kombinasi/campuran bentuk integrasi dalam penelitian. Jurnal Studi Guru Dan Pembelajaran, 4(3), 735-739.
Ismail,I. Idrus, R. M. & Johari, S. S. M. (2010). Acceptance on Mobile Learning via SMS: A Rasch Model Analysis. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 4(2), pp. 10–16.
Rahayu, T. D. Purnomo, B. H. & Sukidin, S. (2014). Analisis tingkat kesukaran dan daya beda pada soal ujian tengah semester ganjil bentuk pilihan ganda mata pelajaran ekonomi kelas X di SMA Negeri 5 Jember tahun ajaran 2012-2013. Jurnal Edukasi UNEJ, 1(1), pp. 39–43.
Ratumanan, T. G., & Laurens, T. (2011). Penilaian Hasil Belajar pada Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan. Ambon: Unesa University Press.
Rooijakkers, A., Riberu, J., & Sornoro. (1991). Mengajar dengan sukses. Gramedia.
Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2015). Aplikasi pemodelan rasch pada assessment pendidikan. Trim komunikata.
Tennant, A. McKenna, S. P. & Hagell, P. (2004). Application of Rasch analysis in the development and application of quality of life instruments,” Value in Health, 7(1), pp. S22–S26.
Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.