Digitized but disconnected: CSR platform governance and environmental exclusion in oil-producing villages of Indonesia

Authors

  • Zulfa Harirah Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia
    ID Indonesia
  • Gusmansyah Gusmansyah Universitas Rokania, Indonesia
    ID Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62672/joease.v4i2.163

Keywords:

Corporate social responsibility, Digital platforms, Environmental governance, Oil-producing villages, Participatory governance

Abstract

This study examines why digitally mediated corporate social responsibility (CSR) governance has failed to address structural and ecological problems in oil- and gas-producing villages in Riau Province, Indonesia. Oil and gas corporations formally articulate commitments to social and environmental responsibility in official policy documents; however, their corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives are predominantly symbolic in nature and tend to be constrained to short-term, project-based interventions such as vocational training, food assistance, and basic road infrastructure development. These interventions do not engage with the structural drivers of environmental degradation, persistent poverty, and the absence of a locally grounded green transition. Methodologically, the research employs a qualitative design, drawing on semi-structured interviews with village authorities, residents, and officials from the Riau Provincial Government. The analysis further incorporates a documentary review of policy texts, CSR implementation reports, and digital CSR governance platforms. The data were analyzed to identify exclusionary mechanisms and disjuncture between formal governance architectures and actual CSR practices. The findings demonstrate that although digital CSR systems formally enhance transparency and open channels for participation, villagers’ engagement is largely confined to the submission of administrative proposals, with no meaningful avenues for deliberation, co-decision-making, or inclusive oversight. Decision-making authority remains concentrated in the hands of corporate actors and local elites, frequently mediated through political recommendations issued by local government leaders. In response to these dynamics, the study advocates a reconfiguration toward “participatory digital governance,” in which digital CSR platforms are mandated to incorporate community-led monitoring, binding feedback loops, and direct accountability mechanisms.

References

Aamir, A. A. (2024). Digital media’s corporate social responsibility (CSR) and public perception of brands.

Apergis, N., & Katsaiti, M.-S. (2018). Poverty and the resource curse: Evidence from a global panel of countries. Research in Economics, 72(2), 211–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rie.2018.04.001

Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 35(4), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2018.1559388

Atanasov, A., Chipriyanova, G., & Krasteva-Hristova, R. (2023). Integration of digital technologies in corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities: A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 16(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm16080373

Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah Kabupaten Bengkalis. (2025). Kajian lingkungan hidup strategis Kabupaten Bengkalis.

Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Riau. (2025). Riau Province in figures 2025. Badan Pusat Statistik.

Boulanouar, Z., & Essid, L. (2023). Extending the resource curse hypothesis to sustainability: Unveiling the environmental impacts of natural resource rents and subsidies in fossil fuel-rich MENA countries. Resources Policy, 87, 104330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104330

Brunnschweiler, C., Lujala, P., Putri, P., Scherzer, S., & Wardhani, I. (2025). When petroleum revenue transparency policy meets citizen engagement reality: Survey evidence from Indonesia. Ecological Economics, 230, 108529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108529

Cristyano, C., Suryadi, S., & Riyanto, R. (2025). Mapping the evolution of corporate social responsibility research (2015–2024): A bibliometric analysis based on Scopus. Journal of Governance and Public Policy, 12(2), 206–222. https://doi.org/10.18196/jgpp.v12i2.25936

Dong, C., Huang, Q., Ni, S., Zhang, B., & Chen, C. (2024). Constructing care-based corporate social responsibility (CSR) communication during the COVID-19 pandemic: A comparison of Fortune 500 companies in China and the United States. Journal of Business Ethics, 192(4), 775–802. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-023-05531-9

Ebisi, E. A., Guo, Y., & Soomro, Z. A. (2025). Environmental conservation and corporate social responsibility (CSR): Insights from the Nigerian oil and gas industry using stakeholder and environmental justice theories. Administrative Sciences, 15(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15070275

Famularo, J. (2023). Corporate social responsibility communication in the ICT sector: Digital issues, greenwashing, and materiality. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-023-00082-8

Fernández, P., Hartmann, P., & Apaolaza, V. (2022). What drives CSR communication effectiveness on social media? A process-based theoretical framework and research agenda. International Journal of Advertising, 41(3), 385–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2021.1947016

Frynas, J. G. (2010). Corporate social responsibility and societal governance: Lessons from transparency in the oil and gas sector. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(Suppl. 2), 163–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0559-1

Forum Indonesia untuk Transparansi Anggaran (FITRA) Riau. (2024). Optimalisasi dana bagi hasil migas dan corporate social responsibility di Provinsi Riau. FITRA Riau.

Pemerintah Kabupaten Pelalawan. (2023). Peraturan Bupati Pelalawan Nomor 41 Tahun 2023 tentang pengelolaan tanggung jawab sosial perusahaan. Pemerintah Kabupaten Pelalawan

Gaber, J. (2019). Building “a ladder of citizen participation”: Sherry Arnstein, citizen participation, and model cities. Journal of the American Planning Association, 85(3), 188–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2019.1612267

Hajad, V., Ikhsan, I., Herizal, H., Latif, I. R., & Marefanda, N. (2023). Poverty and the curse of natural resources in Indonesia. Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy, 4(1), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.46507/jcgpp.v4i1.92

Han, S., Liu, Z., Deng, Z., Gupta, S., & Mikalef, P. (2024). Exploring the effect of digital CSR communication on firm performance: A deep learning approach. Decision Support Systems, 176, 114047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2023.114047

Jiang, W., Wu, J., & Yang, X. (2023). Does digitization drive corporate social responsibility? International Review of Economics & Finance, 88, 14–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2023.06.010

Hwang, J. (2024). Corporate social responsibility (CSR) in the digital age: Investigating the challenges and future insights. GSC Advanced Research and Reviews, 21(1), 503–518. https://doi.org/10.30574/gscarr.2024.21.1.0383

Kocurikova, A., Kopriva, J., & Tetrevova, L. (2024). Unlocking the power of corporate social responsibility communication in the online sphere: A systematic exploration. Sustainability, 16(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16062296

Liu, H., Han, P., & Wang, S. (2024). Enhancing corporate social responsibility in the digital economy era: Evidence from China. Heliyon, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23459

Morsing, M., & Schultz, M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility communication: Stakeholder information, response, and involvement strategies. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(4), 323–338.

Pemerintah Kabupaten Bengkalis. (2024). TJSP activity list report (Tanjak Bermasa). Pemerintah Kabupaten Bengkalis

Pfajfar, G., Shoham, A., Małecka, A., & Zalaznik, M. (2022). Value of corporate social responsibility for multiple stakeholders and social impact: A relationship marketing perspective. Journal of Business Research, 143, 46–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.051

Platteau, J.-P. (2004). Monitoring elite capture in community-driven development. Development and Change, 35(2), 223–246. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2004.00350.x

Putri, P. S., & Rye, S. A. (2024). Understanding the role of place in local extractive industries transparency: Evidence from an oil-rich district of Indonesia. The Extractive Industries and Society, 19, 101511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2024.101511

Ragnedda, M., & Muschert, G. W. (2015). The digital divide: The Internet and social inequality in international perspective. Routledge.

Ragnedda, M., Ruiu, M. L., & Addeo, F. (2022). The self-reinforcing effect of digital and social exclusion: The inequality loop. Telematics and Informatics, 72, 101852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2022.101852

Riau Province Government. (2024). Optimalisasi daerah penghasil migas.

Van Dijk, J. (2020). The digital divide. Polity Press.

Wahyudi, H., & Palupi, W. A. (2023). Natural resources curse in Indonesia. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 13(2), 349–356. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.14077

Warschauer, M. (2004). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. MIT Press.

West, D. M. (2004). E-government and the transformation of service delivery and citizen attitudes.

Zheng, Q., Luo, Y., & Maksimov, V. (2015). Achieving legitimacy through corporate social responsibility: The case of emerging economy firms. Journal of World Business, 50(3), 389–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2014.05.001

Zhou, J., Ye, S., Liu, X., & Tang, Y. (2024). The role of social media in CSR performance: An integrated institutional and resource dependence perspective. Journal of Business Research, 184, 114880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114880

Downloads

Published

29-04-2026

How to Cite

Harirah, Z., & Gusmansyah, G. (2026). Digitized but disconnected: CSR platform governance and environmental exclusion in oil-producing villages of Indonesia. Journal of Environment and Sustainability Education, 4(2), 298–308. https://doi.org/10.62672/joease.v4i2.163

Issue

Section

Articles