Analysis of the need for science literacy-based textbooks to improve students' competence in the earth and space course

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62672/joease.v3i1.59

Keywords:

needs analysis, textbook, student competence, science literacy, earth and space

Abstract

In the 21st-century learning era, the quality of teaching materials is crucial in meeting current educational needs. This study highlights the urgency of developing a science literacy-based textbook for the Earth and Space course to enhance students' scientific literacy competence in the Physics Education Study Program at Mulawarman University. The research aims to analyze the necessity of such a textbook using the 4D development model, focusing on the Define phase to identify key learning challenges and curriculum needs. Data were collected through classroom observations, student questionnaires involving 42 participants from the 2023 cohort, and the formulation of learning outcomes aligned with the three scientific literacy competencies of the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA): (1) explaining scientific phenomena (2) evaluating and designing scientific investigations, and (3) interpreting data and scientific evidence. The data analysis process involved data reduction, presentation, and conclusion drawing. The findings indicate that the current teaching materials do not fully support the learning objectives, leading students to rely on fragmented online resources, often in English. The study also identified a strong demand for structured, interactive textbooks integrating scientific literacy. The validation process involved three expert validators using a Likert scale assessment. This validation resulted in eight valid learning outcomes (CPMK) with a corrected item-total correlation of r > 0.3 and a Cronbach's Alpha of 0.848, confirming high reliability. These findings provide a foundational framework for developing an Earth and Space textbook, ensuring its alignment with science literacy competencies in subsequent research phases.

References

Abina, A., Temeljotov Salaj, A., Cestnik, B., Karalič, A., Ogrinc, M., Kovačič Lukman, R., & Zidanšek, A. (2024). Challenging 21st-Century Competencies for STEM Students: Companies’ Vision in Slovenia and Norway in the Light of Global Initiatives for Competencies Development. Sustainability (Switzerland), 16(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16031295

Adeleke, A. A., & Joshua, E. O. (2015). Development and Validation of Scientific Literacy Achievement Test to Assess Senior Secondary School Students ’ Literacy Acquisition in Physics. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(7), 28–43.

Afandi, Sajidan, Akhyar, M., & Suryani, N. (2019). Development frameworks of the Indonesian partnership 21 st -century skills standards for prospective science teachers: A Delphi study. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(1), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i1.11647

Ansori, I., Ramalis, T. R., & Utama, J. A. (2013). Analisis Kurikulum Ilmu Pengetahuan Bumi Dan Antariksa Pada Jenjang Sekolah Menengah Atas. WaPFi (Wahana Pendidikan Fisika), 1(1), 76–83.

Arief, M., Dhiah, R. ;, Eka, F. ;, Andriansyah, H., Muhammad, ;, Ghofur, A., Albrian, ;, & Prakoso, F. (2021). Development of Research Methodologu Textbook Based-On Contextual Teaching and Learning. Interantional Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Undestanding, 8(12), 618–626.

Azevedo, J., & Marques, M. (2017). Climate literacy: A systematic review and model integration. International Journal of Global Warming, 12(3–4), 414–430. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJGW.2017.084789

Boster, J. B., & McCarthy, J. W. (2018). Lost in translation: Understanding Students’ use of social networking and online resources to support early clinical practices. A National Survey of graduate speech-language pathology students. Education and Information Technologies, 23(1), 321–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9603-4

Bulunuz, N., & Jarrett, O. S. (2009). Understanding of Earth and Space Science Concepts: Strategies for Concept-Building in Elementary Teacher Preparation. School Science and Mathematics, 109(5), 276–289. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2009.tb18092.x

Choe, Y., & Kim, N. (2024). From the classroom to the Living Lab for developing competencies in tourism higher education. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, 35(June), 100511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2024.100511

Davis, B. G. (2009). Tools for teaching. John Wiley & Sons.

Dichev, C., & Dicheva, D. (2017). Towards Data Science Literacy. Procedia Computer Science, 108(June), 2151–2160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.05.240

Effendi, D. N., Irwandani, Anggraini, W., Jatmiko, A., Rahmayanti, H., Ichsan, I. Z., & Rahman, M. M. (2021). Bibliometric analysis of scientific literacy using VOS viewer: Analysis of science education. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1796(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1796/1/012096

Glaze, A. L. (2018). Teaching and learning science in the 21st century: Challenging critical assumptions in post-secondary science. Education Sciences, 8(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8010012

Hajjar, S. T. EL. (2018). Statistical Analysis: Internal-Consistency Reliability and Construct Validity. International Journal of Quantitative and Qualitative Research Methods, 6(1), 27–38.

Hakim, A., Efwinda, S., Damayanti, P., Syam, M., Mutmainah, O., & Norsaputra, A. (2023). Improving Climate Literacy of High School Students Through Physics Teaching Materials Based on Stem. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 12(4), 526–536. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v12i4.43188

Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3(February), 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004

Harefa, E. B. (2022). Efektivitas Pembelajaran Daring Mata Kuliah Fisika Di Perguruan Tinggi. Educativo: Jurnal Pendidikan, 1(1), 75–83. https://doi.org/10.56248/educativo.v1i1.12

Heale, R., & Twycross, A. (2015). Validity and Reliability in Quantitative Studies. Evidence-Based Nursing, 18(3), 66–67. https://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2015-102129

Hsu, Y. C. (2024). Mapping the Landscape of Data Science Education in Higher General Education in Taiwan: A Comprehensive Syllabi Analysis. Education Sciences, 14(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14070763

Jefri, M., Anggraini, D., & Zulyati Oktora, M. (2022). Validitas dan Reliabilitas Kuesioner Penilaian Pembelajaran Skills Lab Secara Daring pada Mahasiswa Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Baiturrahmah Padang. Scientific Journal, 1(1), 36–45. https://doi.org/10.56260/sciena.v1i1.16

Karaca-Atik, A., Meeuwisse, M., Gorgievski, M., & Smeets, G. (2023). Uncovering important 21st-century skills for sustainable career development of social sciences graduates: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 39(August 2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100528

Karyono, H., & Subandowo, M. (2019). Pengembangan Buku Ajar Mata Kuliah Perkembangan Peserta Didik Berbasis Kompetensi Pedagogik. Buana Pendidikan: Jurnal Fakultas Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan, 15(27), 35–54. https://doi.org/10.36456/bp.vol15.no27.a1792

Keshavarz, M. (2011). Measuring course learning outcomes. Journal of Learning Design, 4(4), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.5204/jld.v4i4.84

Kumar, P., Sahani, J., Rawat, N., Debele, S., Tiwari, A., Mendes Emygdio, A. P., Abhijith, K. V., Kukadia, V., Holmes, K., & Pfautsch, S. (2023). Using empirical science education in schools to improve climate change literacy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 178(May 2022), 113232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113232

Kurniawan, W., Pujaningsih, F. B., Alrizal, A., & Latifah, N. A. (2018). Analisis Kebutuhan Mahasiswa Terhadap Bahan Ajar Sebagai Acuan Untuk Pengembangan Modul Fisika Gelombang Bola Dan Tabung. EduFisika, 3(01), 17–25. https://doi.org/10.22437/edufisika.v3i01.5805

Mahajan, M., & Singh, M. K. S. (2017). Importance and Benefits of Learning Outcomes. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 22(03), 65–67. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-2203056567

Mashelin Wulandari, Astalini, & Darmaji. (2021). Analisis Kebutuhan Mahasiswa terhadap Pengembangan E-Modul Fisika Matematika I di Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika FKIP Universitas Jambi. Jurnal Pendidikan Mipa, 11(2), 23–28. https://doi.org/10.37630/jpm.v11i2.473

Mesra, R., Salem, V. E. T., Polii, M. G. M., Santie, Y. D. A., Sarwandi, S., Sari, R. P., Wisudariani, N. M. R., Permana, R., Nasar, A., Yenita, Y., & Santiari, N. P. L. (2023). Research & Development Dalam Pendidikan. In Https://Doi.Org/10.31219/Osf.Io/D6Wck.

Mogias, A., Boubonari, T., & Kevrekidis, T. (2021). Examining the presence of ocean literacy principles in Greek primary school textbooks. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 30(4), 314–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2021.1877953

OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework. In OECD Publishing.

OECD. (2024). PISA 2025 Science Framework.

Papilaya, J. O., & Huliselan, N. (2016). Identifikasi Gaya Belajar Mahasiswa. Jurnal Psikologi Undip, 15(1), 56. https://doi.org/10.14710/jpu.15.1.56-63

Patresiyah, M., Syarifah, S., Oktiansyah, R., & ... (2021). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Audio Visual Berbasis Microsoft Power Point Pada Materi Sistem Ekskresi Kelas XI di SMA/MA. Prosiding Seminar …, 4(1), 63–68.

Purwanto, A., & Risdianto, E. (2022). Analisis Kebutuhan Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Digital Matakuliah Geofisika Berbasis Platform Lms Moodle Untuk Menunjang Implementasi Kurikulum Mbkm. Jurnal Kumparan Fisika, 5(1), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.33369/jkf.5.1.7-14

Qiao, C., Chen, Y., Guo, Q., & Yu, Y. (2024). Understanding science data literacy: a conceptual framework and assessment tool for college students majoring in STEM. International Journal of STEM Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00484-5

Rezeqi, S., Brata, W. W. W., Handayani, D., & Gani, A. R. F. (2020). Analisis Kebutuhan Bahan Ajar Taksonomi Organisme Tingkat Rendah Terhadap Capaian Pembelajaran Berbasis Kkni. Jurnal Pelita Pendidikan, 8(2), 126–133. https://doi.org/10.24114/jpp.v8i2.17697

Rokhmah, A., Sunarno, W., & Masykuri, M. (2017). Science Literacy Indicators in Optical Instruments of Highschool Physics Textbooks Chapter. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 13(1), 19–24. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi.v13i1.8391

Schoepp, K. (2019). The state of course learning outcomes at leading universities. Studies in Higher Education, 44(4), 615–627. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1392500

Selwyn, N., Hillman, T., Bergviken Rensfeldt, A., & Perrotta, C. (2023). Digital Technologies and the Automation of Education — Key Questions and Concerns. Postdigital Science and Education, 5(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00263-3

Shu, X., & Gu, X. (2023). An Empirical Study of A Smart Education Model Enabled by the Edu-Metaverse to Enhance Better Learning Outcomes for Students. Systems, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11020075

Suprapto, N., Tafauliyati, T., & Yanti, V. K. (2022). Development of e-Book with Flip PDF Professional Based on Scientific Literacy. TEM Journal, 11(2), 851–855. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM112-44

Wirawati, A., Cinthia, Y., & Nugraha, A. S. (2022). Pengaruh kebiasaan belajar terhadap hasil belajar mahasiswa pendidikan matematika Universitas Sanata Dharma. Jurnal Pendidikan Surya Edukasi (JPSE), 8(2), 139–143. https://doi.org/10.37729/jpse.v8i2.2139

Yao, J. X., & Guo, Y. Y. (2018). Core competences and scientific literacy: the recent reform of the school science curriculum in China. International Journal of Science Education, 40(15), 1913–1933. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1514544

Yenni, R., Hernani, & Widodo, A. (2017). The Implementation of Integrated Science Teaching Materials Based Socio-Scientific Issues to Improve Students Scientific Literacy for Environmental Pollution Theme. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1848(Mathematics, Science, and Computer Science Education (MSCEIS 2016)). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4983970

Zidny, R., Sjöström, J., & Eilks, I. (2020). A Multi-Perspective Reflection on How Indigenous Knowledge and Related Ideas Can Improve Science Education for Sustainability. Science and Education, 29(1), 145–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00100-x

Downloads

Published

31-03-2025

How to Cite

Damayanti, P., Efwinda, S., Hakim, A., Syam, M., & Sundari, P. D. (2025). Analysis of the need for science literacy-based textbooks to improve students’ competence in the earth and space course. Journal of Environment and Sustainability Education, 3(1), 127–139. https://doi.org/10.62672/joease.v3i1.59

Issue

Section

Articles