The impact of implementing a scientific approach on the science learning achievements of 4th-grade students within the learning environment

Authors

  • Budi Tri Cahyono Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia
  • Jovita Ridhani Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia
  • Taufiq Subhanul Qodr Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia
  • Nauroz Khan University College of Dera Murad Jamali, Pakistan
  • Wazir Ali Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62672/joease.v3i1.61

Keywords:

scientific approach, formulating questions, observational methods

Abstract

This study investigates the influence of a scientific approach on the academic performance of 4th students in science. The scientific approach focuses on key processes such as observation, formulating questions, making connections, conducting experiments, analyzing data, drawing conclusions, and presenting findings, distinguishing it from traditional science education methods. Employing a quantitative research design with a quasi-experimental non-equivalent control group, the study targeted all Gugus I Gajah Mada Laweyan Surakarta 4th students. A sample of 120 students from eight elementary schools was selected, with participants divided into experimental and control groups, each comprising 60 students. Data collection involved both observational methods and essay assessments featuring 30 questions. The findings revealed a notable disparity in science learning outcomes between students instructed using the scientific approach and those who received conventional instruction. Specifically, students in the experimental group demonstrated significantly superior learning outcomes compared to their counterparts in the control group. The results of the study showed that the assessment of learning outcomes using observation sheets had a significant effect on teacher involvement during the learning process. The results of the Lillefors Statistical test show the difference between scientific and conventional classes, with the former showing a higher value of 0.95 compared to 0.87. This indicates that the use of digital learning media effectively attracts the interest of students and teachers.

References

Açikgül, K. (2021). Developing a two-tier proportional reasoning skill test: Validity and reliability studies. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 8(2), 357–375. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.909316

Adipat, S., Laksana, K., Busayanon, K., Ausawasowan, A., & Adipat, B. (2021). Engaging students in the learning process with game-based learning: The fundamental concepts. International Journal of Technology in Education, 4(3), 542–552. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.169

Ahmadin. (2022). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, 6(1), 104–113.

Chiu, T. K. F. (2021). Digital support for student engagement in blended learning based on self-determination theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 124, 106909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106909

Depdiknas. (2003). Undang-Undang RI No. 20 tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Retrieved from https://jdih.kemdikbud.go.id/sjdih/siperpu/dokumen/salinan/UU_tahun2003_nomor020.pdf

Demir, Y., & Emre, İ. (2020). The effect of learning activities based on 5E learning model on 4th grade science teaching. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 16(3), 573–586. https://doi.org/10.17860/mersinefd.750957

Dewanti, B. A. (2022). Comparing student creativity skills in experiment-based and project-based science learning. Prisma Sains: Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu dan Pembelajaran Matematika dan IPA IKIP Mataram, 10(3), 786. https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v10i3.5348

Dignath, C., & Veenman, M. V. J. (2021). The role of direct strategy instruction and indirect activation of self-regulated learning: Evidence from classroom observation studies. Educational Psychology Review, 33(2), 489–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09534-0

El-Sabagh, H. A. (2021). Adaptive e-learning environment based on learning styles and its impact on the development of students’ engagement. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00289-4

Eungoo, K., & Hwang, H.-J. (2021). Ethical conducts in qualitative research methodology: Participant observation and interview process. Journal of Research and Publication Ethics, 2(2), 5–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.15722/jrpe.2.2.202109.5

Fathurohman, M., Iqbal Al Ghozali, M., Purwati, R., & Permatasari, F. (2022). The effectiveness of experimental methods on student learning outcomes in science subject in elementary school. Scentia: Social Science & Humanities, 1(2), 388–390. https://doi.org/110.51773/icobba.v1i2.107

Harefa, D., Sarumaha, M., Telaumbanua, K., Telaumbanua, T., Laia, B., & Hulu, F. (2023). Relationship student learning interest to the learning outcomes of natural sciences. International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences, 4(2), 240–246. https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v4i2.614

Inel-Ekici, D., & Ekici, M. (2022). Mobile inquiry and inquiry-based science learning in higher education: Advantages, challenges, and attitudes. Asia Pacific Education Review, 23(3), 427–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-021-09729-2

Kite, V., Park, S., McCance, K., & Seung, E. (2021). Secondary science teachers’ understandings of the epistemic nature of science practices. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 32(3), 243–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2020.1808757

Küçük, A., & Yıldırım, N. (2020). The effect of out-of-school learning activities on 5th-grade students’ science, technology, society, and environment views. Turkish Journal of Teacher Education, 9(1). http://www.tujted.com/files/15/manuscript/manuscript_1471/tujted-1471-manuscript-112650.pdf

Muhsam, J., Hasyida, S., Uslan, & Aiman, U. (2021). Implementation of contextual teaching and learning and authentic assessments to the science (IPA) learning outcomes of 4th grade students of primary schools (SD) in Kota Kupang. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 5(3), 380–390. https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JERE/article/view/32338

Nugroho, A. S., Nursalim, M., & Sujarwanto. (2022). Spiritual intelligence is directly proportional to the improvement of social attitudes of elementary school students. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Nusantara, 8(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.29407/jpdn.v8i1.17990

Opdal, P. A. (2022). To do or to listen? Student active learning vs. the lecture. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 41(1), 71–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-021-09796-3

Pramana, C., Chamidah, D., Suyatno, S., Renadi, F., & Syaharuddin, S. (2021). Strategies to improve education quality in Indonesia: A review. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 12(3), 1977–1994. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353299393

Purnadewi, G. A. A., Arnawa, N., & Tatminingsih, S. (2023). The influence of school culture, learning interest, and learning motivation on science learning outcomes. Indonesian Journal of Educational Development, 4(2), 126–138. https://doi.org/10.59672/ijed.v4i2.3040

Rahman, M. M. (2023). Sample size determination for survey research and non-probability sampling techniques: A review and set of recommendations. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Business and Economics, 11(1), 42–62. www.scientificia.com

Supena, I., Darmuki, A., & Hariyadi, A. (2021). The influence of the 4C (constructive, critical, creativity, collaborative) learning model on students’ learning outcomes. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3), 873–892. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14351a

Svenningsson, J., Höst, G., Hultén, M., & Hallström, J. (2022). Students’ attitudes toward technology: Exploring the relationship among affective, cognitive and behavioral components of the attitude construct. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32(3), 1531–1551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-021-09657-7

Teslo, S., Thurston, M., Lerum, Ø., Brekke Mandelid, M., Sørnes Jenssen, E., Resaland, G. K., & Eikeland Tjomsland, H. (2023). Teachers’ sensemaking of physically active learning: A qualitative study of primary and secondary school teachers participating in a continuing professional development program in Norway. Teaching and Teacher Education, 127, 104113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104113

Cahyono, B. T., Prihatin, R., Suparmi, S., Sukmawati, F., & Santosa, E. B. (2023). Development of authentic assessment with project based learning approach in primary school students. Qalamuna, 15(1), 539–548. https://doi.org/10.37680/qalamuna.v15i1.3987

Downloads

Published

31-03-2024

How to Cite

Cahyono, B. T., Ridhani, J., Qodr, T. S., Khan, N., & Ali, W. (2024). The impact of implementing a scientific approach on the science learning achievements of 4th-grade students within the learning environment. Journal of Environment and Sustainability Education, 3(1), 82–87. https://doi.org/10.62672/joease.v3i1.61

Issue

Section

Articles