The effect of PBL-social model on creative thinking skills of pre-service physics teachers

Authors

  • Irwandani Irwandani Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung, Indonesia
    ID Indonesia
  • Nur Endah Susilowati Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
    ID Indonesia
  • Soeharto Soeharto Azerbaijan State University of Economics, Azerbaijan
    AZ Azerbaijan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62672/joease.v3i2.96

Keywords:

Creative thinking, PBL-Socio, Physics Education, Rach Model, Teacher Training

Abstract

This study examines the effectiveness of the Socio-Based Problem-Based Learning (PBL-Socio) model in enhancing the creative thinking skills of prospective physics teachers. Rooted in constructivist pedagogy, the PBL-Socio model integrates real-world social issues into the learning process to foster deeper engagement and higher-order thinking. A quasi-experimental design was conducted involving 53 undergraduate students from a physics education program in Indonesia, divided into experimental and control groups. The experimental group engaged in PBL-Socio activities, while the control group followed conventional instruction. Students’ creative thinking abilities—measured through fluency, flexibility, and originality—were assessed using an open-ended instrument and analyzed with the Rasch measurement model. Results showed a notable improvement in the experimental group’s creative thinking performance, with a mean gain of +1.63 logits compared to +1.03 in the control group. Rasch analysis indicated more consistent performance, reduced score variability, and stronger alignment with high-difficulty items among students exposed to the PBL-Socio model. Further analysis through Differential Item Functioning (DIF) revealed meaningful differences across learning styles and educational backgrounds, emphasizing the importance of inclusive instructional design. The findings suggest that integrating socially relevant content into physics instruction can significantly enhance both the quality and equity of creative thinking development in teacher education. This study contributes to the growing body of evidence supporting socially contextualized learning as a powerful driver of 21st-century competencies in STEM education.

References

Abu Raya, M., Ogunyemi, A. O., Rojas Carstensen, V., Broder, J., Illanes-Manrique, M., & Rankin, K. P. (2023). The reciprocal relationship between openness and creativity: from neurobiology to multicultural environments. Frontiers in Neurology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1235348

Affandy, H., Sunarno, W., Suryana, R., & Harjana. (2024). Integrating creative pedagogy into problem-based learning: The effects on higher order thinking skills in science education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 53(December 2023), 101575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101575

Almulla, M. A. (2020). The Effectiveness of the Project-Based Learning (PBL) Approach as a Way to Engage Students in Learning. Sage Open, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020938702

Alsmadi, H., Kandasamy, G., Al Kafri, A., & Zahirah, K. F. (2024). Empowering computing students through multidisciplinary project based learning (PBL): Creating meaningful differences in the real world. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 10, 101180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101180

Amna Saleem, Huma Kausar, & Farah Deeba. (2021). Social Constructivism: A New Paradigm in Teaching and Learning Environment. PERENNIAL JOURNAL OF HISTORY, 2(2), 403–421. https://doi.org/10.52700/pjh.v2i2.86

Antonio, R. P., & Prudente, M. S. (2023). Effects of Inquiry-Based Approaches on Students’ Higher-Order Thinking Skills in Science: A Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 12(1), 251–281. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.3216

Arviani, F. P., Wahyudin, D., & Dewi, L. (2023). The Effectiveness of Problem Based Learning Model in Improving Students’ Higher Order Thinking Skills. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 12(4), 627–635. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpiundiksha.v12i4.65606

Ashraf, M. A., Khan, M. N., Chohan, S. R., Khan, M., Rafique, W., Farid, M. F., & Khan, A. U. (2021). Social Media Improves Students’ Academic Performance: Exploring the Role of Social Media Adoption in the Open Learning Environment among International Medical Students in China. Healthcare, 9(10), 1272. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9101272

Aure, P. A. H. (2025). Action research as a creative teaching method for humanistic management education: A case study of undergraduate business students. International Journal of Management Education, 23(2), 101179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2025.101179

Avinç, E., & Doğan, F. (2024). Digital literacy scale: Validity and reliability study with the rasch model. In Education and Information Technologies (Vol. 29, Issue 17). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12662-7

Bao, L., & Koenig, K. (2019). Physics education research for 21st century learning. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0007-8

Boone, W. J., & Noltemeyer, A. (2017). Rasch analysis: A primer for school psychology researchers and practitioners. Cogent Education, 4(1), 1416898. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2017.1416898

Chan, S. W., Looi, C. K., & Sumintono, B. (2021). Assessing computational thinking abilities among Singapore secondary students: a Rasch model measurement analysis. Journal of Computers in Education, 8(2), 213–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-020-00177-2

Christopoulos, A., Styliou, M., Ntalas, N., & Stylios, C. (2024). The Impact of Immersive Virtual Reality on Knowledge Acquisition and Adolescent Perceptions in Cultural Education. Information (Switzerland), 15(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/info15050261

Ciriello, R. F., Richter, A., & Mathiassen, L. (2024). Emergence of creativity in IS development teams: A socio-technical systems perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 74, 102698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102698

Creswell, J., Clark, V., Gutmann, M., & Hanson, W. (2003). Advance Mixed methods Research Designs. In Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 209–240).

Dubinsky, J. M., & Hamid, A. A. (2024). The neuroscience of active learning and direct instruction. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 163, 105737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105737

Garnham, W. (2019). Disrupting Traditional Pedagogy: Active Learning in Practice (T. Betts & P. Oprandi (eds.)). University of Sussex Library. https://doi.org/10.20919/9780995786240

Henriksen, D., Richardson, C., & Mehta, R. (2017). Design thinking: A creative approach to educational problems of practice. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 26(March), 140–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.10.001

Hernandez, J. E., Vasan, N., Huff, S., & Melovitz-Vasan, C. (2020). Learning Styles/Preferences Among Medical Students: Kinesthetic Learner’s Multimodal Approach to Learning Anatomy. Medical Science Educator, 30(4), 1633–1638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-020-01049-1

Hogan, D., & O’flaherty, J. (2021). Addressing education for sustainable development in the teaching of science: the case of a biological sciences teacher education program. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/su132112028

Högström, P., Gericke, N., Wallin, J., & Bergman, E. (2024). Teaching Socioscientific Issues: A Systematic Review. Science & Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-024-00542-y

J. A. C. van der Zanden, P., Meijer, P. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2020). A review study about creativity in adolescence: Where is the social context? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 38, 100702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100702

Jatmiko, A., Armita, N., Irwandani, Saputro, T., & Aridan, M. (2024). Development of Science Learning Videos with the Canva Application on Socioscientific Issues Content. E3S Web of Conferences, 482, 05004. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202448205004

Kumar Shah, R. (2019). Effective Constructivist Teaching Learning in the Classroom. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 7(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v7i4.600

Liu, Y., & Pásztor, A. (2022). Effects of problem-based learning instructional intervention on critical thinking in higher education: A meta-analysis. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 45, 101069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101069

Lu, X., & Kaiser, G. (2022). Creativity in students’ modelling competencies: conceptualisation and measurement. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 109(2), 287–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10055-y

Macalalag, A. Z., Kaufmann, A., Van Meter, B., Ricketts, A., Liao, E., & Ialacci, G. (2024). Socioscientific issues: promoting science teachers’ pedagogy on social justice. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 6(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-024-00118-4

Markauskaite, L., Marrone, R., Poquet, O., Knight, S., Martinez-Maldonado, R., Howard, S., Tondeur, J., De Laat, M., Buckingham Shum, S., Gašević, D., & Siemens, G. (2022). Rethinking the entwinement between artificial intelligence and human learning: What capabilities do learners need for a world with AI? Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100056

Meland, E. A., & Brion-Meisels, G. (2024). An integrative model for culturally sustaining SEL in the classroom. Social and Emotional Learning: Research, Practice, and Policy, 3, 100042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sel.2024.100042

Molderez, I., & Fonseca, E. (2018). The efficacy of real-world experiences and service learning for fostering competences for sustainable development in higher education. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 4397–4410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.062

Mulyono, Y., Suranto, S., Yamtinah, S., & Sarwanto, S. (2023). Development of Critical and Creative Thinking Skills Instruments Based on Environmental Socio-Scientific Issues. International Journal of Instruction, 16(3), 691–710. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16337a

Nicholus, G., Nzabahimana, J., & Muwonge, C. M. (2024). Evaluating video-based PBL approach on performance and critical thinking ability among Ugandan form-2 secondary school students. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2346040

Richard, M. S., & Cosner, S. (2024). Centering Equity within Principal Preparation and Development: An Integrative Review of the Literature. Education Sciences, 14(9), 944. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14090944

Rosário, A. T., & Dias, J. C. (2024). Implementing Problem-Based Learning in Marketing Education: A Systematic Review and Analysis. Education Sciences, 14(11), 1139. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14111139

Sari, R., & Saleh, M. N. I. (2023). Rasch Model Application: Instrument Development of Readiness to Conduct Inclusive Learning. Psympathic : Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi, 9(2), 213–222. https://doi.org/10.15575/psy.v9i2.10058

Schauber, S. K., Hecht, M., Nouns, Z. M., Kuhlmey, A., & Dettmer, S. (2015). The role of environmental and individual characteristics in the development of student achievement: a comparison between a traditional and a problem-based-learning curriculum. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 20(4), 1033–1052. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-015-9584-2

Singh-Pillay, A. (2024). Exploring Science and Technology Teachers’ Experiences with Integrating Simulation-Based Learning. Education Sciences, 14(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14080803

Soeharto, S., & Csapó, B. (2022). Assessing Indonesian student inductive reasoning: Rasch analysis. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 46, 101132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101132

Suherman, S., & Vidákovich, T. (2022). Assessment of mathematical creative thinking: A systematic review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 44, 101019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101019

Sukackė, V., Guerra, A. O. P. de C., Ellinger, D., Carlos, V., Petronienė, S., Gaižiūnienė, L., Blanch, S., Marbà -Tallada, A., & Brose, A. (2022). Towards Active Evidence-Based Learning in Engineering Education: A Systematic Literature Review of PBL, PjBL, and CBL. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/su142113955

Tassone, V. C., den Brok, P., Tho, C. W. S., & Wals, A. E. J. (2022). Cultivating students’ sustainability-oriented learning at the interface of science and society: a configuration of interrelated enablers. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 23(8), 255–271. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-01-2022-0014

Tsybulsky, D., & Muchnik-Rozanov, Y. (2021). Project-based learning in science-teacher pedagogical practicum: the role of emotional experiences in building preservice teachers’ competencies. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-021-00037-8

Uliyandari, M., Emilia Candrawati, Anna Ayu Herawati, & Nurlia Latipah. (2021). Problem-Based Learning To Improve Concept Understanding and Critical Thinking Ability of Science Education Undergraduate Students. IJORER : International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 2(1), 65–72. https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v2i1.56

Van Hooijdonk, M., Mainhard, T., Kroesbergen, E. H., & Van Tartwijk, J. (2023). Creative problem solving in primary school students. Learning and Instruction, 88, 101823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2023.101823

Wang, X. M., Huang, X. T., Han, Y. H., & Hu, Q. N. (2024). Promoting students’ creative self-efficacy, critical thinking and learning performance: An online interactive peer assessment approach guided by constructivist theory in maker activities. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 52(April), 101548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101548

Weng, X., Chiu, T. K. F., & Tsang, C. C. (2022). Promoting student creativity and entrepreneurship through real-world problem-based maker education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 45(January), 101046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101046

Wijnia, L., Noordzij, G., Arends, L. R., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Loyens, S. M. M. (2024). The Effects of Problem-Based, Project-Based, and Case-Based Learning on Students’ Motivation: a Meta-Analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 36(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09864-3

Wu, Y., Song, D., Dong, Y., Zhong, Q., Gao, S., Sun, J., Fang, S., Zhi, S., Wang, R., & Sun, J. (2025). Effects of a grouping intervention using the Felder-Silverman learning style model on problem-based learning among nursing students: A randomized controlled trial. Nurse Education Today, 145, 106489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106489

Youssef, E., Medhat, M., Abdellatif, S., & Al Malek, M. (2024). Examining the effect of ChatGPT usage on students’ academic learning and achievement: A survey-based study in Ajman, UAE. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100316

Zhai, C., Wibowo, S., & Li, L. D. (2024). The effects of over-reliance on AI dialogue systems on students’ cognitive abilities: a systematic review. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00316-7

Zou, Y., & Yu, Q. (2022). Sense of safety toward tourism destinations: A social constructivist perspective. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 24, 100708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2022.100708

Downloads

Published

30-06-2025

How to Cite

Irwandani, I., Susilowati, N. E., & Soeharto, S. (2025). The effect of PBL-social model on creative thinking skills of pre-service physics teachers. Journal of Environment and Sustainability Education, 3(2), 262–273. https://doi.org/10.62672/joease.v3i2.96

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Environment and Sustainability Education

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.