A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis of education for sustainable development integration in science education and its unaddressed gaps

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62672/joease.v3i4.147

Keywords:

Bibliometric analysis, Education for Sustainable Development (ESD), Science education, Systematic literature review

Abstract

Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) is an important approach to preparing younger generations to face global challenges such as environmental, social, and economic crises. Integrating ESD into science instruction is crucial because science provides the conceptual foundations and critical thinking skills needed to understand sustainability issues. Despite growing attention, implementation remains uneven and the literature is imbalanced across region, levels, and designs. This study examines trends, focus, and research gaps related to ESD in science education through a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) combined with bibliometric analysis. Data were obtained from the Scopus database using the keywords “education for sustainable development” and “science education,” which yielded 81 articles published between 2015-2025 and 46 articles were deemed eligible for analysis. Beyond thematic synthesis, the bibliometric maps reveal the field’s structure, temporal dynamics, and the peripheral positioning of several ESD integrations within science classrooms. The SLR results indicate that research on ESD in science education is dominated by qualitative studies focusing on environmental awareness and sustainable attitudes, leaving a limited evidence base to estimate causal impacts on science competencies and 21st century skills. There are gaps in the development of innovative ESD-based learning models, particularly at the elementary and secondary levels, as well as limitations in measuring 21st-century skills integrated with ESD principles. These findings highlight the need for further exploration of effective and contextual pedagogical approaches to implementing ESD in science education. Methodologically, the concurrent use of SLR and bibliometrics still uncommon in science education to adds depth and enhances interpretive validity.

References

Abu-Alruz, J., Hailat, S., Al-Jaradat, M., & Khasawneh, S. (2018). Attitudes toward pillars of sustainable development: The case for university science education students in Jordan. In Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability (Vol. 20, Issue 2, pp. 64–73). Sciendo. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2018-0015

Barth, M. (2014). Implementing sustainability in higher education: Learning in an age of transformation. Routledge.

Bascopé, M., Perasso, P., & Reiss, K. (2019). Systematic review of sustainability competencies in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 41(14), 1963–1985.

Boeve-de Pauw, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2021). Eco-school evaluation beyond labels: Achievements in student knowledge, attitudes, and behaviour. Environmental Education Research, 27(1), 70–84.

Boeve-de Pauw, J., Gericke, N., Olsson, D., & Berglund, T. (2020). Patterns of sustainability-related teaching practices in science education. Science Education, 104(6), 1107–1134.

Brundiers, K., Barth, M., Cebrián, G., Cohen, M., Diaz, L., Doucette-Remington, S., … Zint, M. (2021). Key competencies in sustainability in higher education—toward an agreed-upon reference framework. Sustainability Science, 16, 13–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00838-2

Cebrián, G., Junyent, M., & Mulà, I. (2020). Competencies in education for sustainable development: Emerging teaching and research developments. In Sustainability (Switzerland) (Vol. 12, Issue 2). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020579

Czok, V., Krug, M., Müller, S., Huwer, J., & Weitzel, H. (2023). Learning Effects of Augmented Reality and Game-Based Learning for Science Teaching in Higher Education in the Context of Education for Sustainable Development. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/su152115313

Eilks, I. (2015). Science education and education for sustainable development - justifications, models, practices and perspectives. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(1), 149–158. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1313a

Ellianawati, E., Subali, B., Putra, B. R., Wahyuni, S., Dwijananti, P., Adhi, M. A., & Yusof, M. M. M. (2025). Critical thinking and creativity in STEAM-based collaborative learning on renewable energy issues. Journal of Education and Learning, 19(1), 112–119. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v19i1.21638

González‐salamanca, J. C., Agudelo, O. L., & Salinas, J. (2020). Key competences, education for sustainable development and strategies for the development of 21st century skills. A systematic literature review. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(24), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410366

Hanisch, S., & Eirdosh, D. (2023). Behavioral Science and Education for Sustainable Development: Towards Metacognitive Competency. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097413

Hastika, A. D., Setiyaningsih, L. B., Verawati, Y., Supriatno, B., & Riandi. (2024). Innovation of Constructivist Teaching Sequences Model Based on Technology in Biology Material. Pedagonal: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 8(2), 106–116. https://doi.org/10.55215/pedagonal.v8i2.3

Hogan, D., & O’Flaherty, J. (2022). Exploring the nature and culture of science as an academic discipline: implications for the integration of education for sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 23(8), 120–147. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-06-2021-0236

Högström, P., Gericke, N., Wallin, J., & Bergman, E. (2024). Teaching socioscientific issues: A systematic review. Science & Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-024-00542-y

Husamah, H., Suwono, H., Nur, H., & Dharmawan, A. (2022). Sustainable development research in Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education: A systematic literature review. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(5). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11965

Jegstad, K. M., Gjøtterud, S. M., & Sinnes, A. T. (2018). Science teacher education for sustainable development: a case study of a residential field course in a Norwegian pre-service teacher education programme. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 18(2), 99–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2017.1374192

João, P., Sá, P., Henriques, M. H., & Rodrigues, A. V. (2022). Sustainable Development in Basic Education Sciences in Portugal—Perspective of Official Curriculum Documents. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095651

Khasanah, A., Yang, J. C., Chang, C. C., & Shein, P. P. (2025). Dialogic education for sustainable development as a pathway to critical thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2025.101783

Kioupi, V., & Voulvoulis, N. (2020). Education for sustainable development: A systemic framework for connecting the SDGs to educational outcomes. Sustainability, 12(21), 8438.

Kumar, V., Choudhary, S. K., & Singh, R. (2024). Environmental socio-scientific issues as contexts in developing scientific literacy in science education: A systematic literature review. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 9, 100765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100765

Li, W., & Al-Hashimi, M. (2024). Problem-based learning and the integration of Sustainable Development Goals in higher education. Journal of Work-Applied Management, 16(2), 218–234. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWAM-12-2023-0142

Munasi, K. R. (2024). Evaluating the Integration of Education for Sustainable Development in the Life Sciences Curriculum: A Case Study of Grade 11 Teachers in Vhembe East District. Sustainability (Switzerland), 16(24). https://doi.org/10.3390/su162410918

NASEM. (2018). Science and Engineering for Grades 6–12: Investigation and Design at the Center. National Academies Press. https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/25216/science-and-engineering-for-grades-6-12-investigation-and-design

Olsson, D., Gericke, N., & Rundgren, S. N. C. (2020). The effect of ESD on students’ sustainability consciousness. Environmental Education Research, 26(4), 527–544.

Olsson, D., Torbjörnsson, T., & Gericke, N. (2022). Teachers’ ESD self-efficacy and practices: A longitudinal study on the impact of professional development. Environmental Education Research, 28(4), 523–543. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2022.2042206

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. bmj, 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Queiruga-Dios, M. Á., López-Iñesta, E., Diez-Ojeda, M., Sáiz-Manzanares, M. C., & Dorrío, J. B. V. (2020). Citizen science for scientific literacy and the attainment of sustainable development goals in formal education. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104283

Redman, A., & Wiek, A. (2021). Competency mapping for education for sustainable development: A review of research and practice. Sustainability Science, 16, 1063–1079.

Redman, A., Wiek, A., & Barth, M. (2021). Current practice of assessing students’ sustainability competencies: A review of tools. Sustainability Science, 16, 117–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00855-1

Riess, W., Martin, M., Mischo, C., Kotthoff, H. G., & Waltner, E. M. (2022). How Can Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) Be Effectively Implemented in Teaching and Learning? An Analysis of Educational Science Recommendations of Methods and Procedures to Promote ESD Goals. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14073708

Schleicher, K., & Schmidt, C. (2020). Citizen science in Germany as research and sustainability education: Analysis of the main forms and foci and its relation to the sustainable development goals. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(15). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156044

Schuler, S., Fanta, D., Rosenkraenzer, F., & Riess, W. (2018). Systems thinking within the scope of education for sustainable development (ESD)–a heuristic competence model as a basis for (science) teacher education. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 42(2), 192–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2017.1339264

Schwarz, C. V., Passmore, C., & Reiser, B. J. (Eds.). (2017). Helping students make sense of the world using next generation science and engineering practices. NSTA Press.

Singer-Brodowski, M., Brock, A., Grund, J., & de Haan, G. (2021). Reflections on the science–policy interface within education for sustainable development in Germany. Environmental Education Research, 27(4), 554–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2020.1813691

Solihat, R., Haqiqi, B. Y., & Widodo, A. (2024). Waste to energy: A STEM-ESD approach to improve student awareness and action in converting waste into eco-friendly energy. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 10(3), 1072–1085. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v10i3.34330

Stouthart, T., Bayram, D., & van der Veen, J. (2025). Science teachers’ views on student competences in education for sustainable development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.22021

Sund, P., & Gericke, N. (2020). Teaching contributions from secondary school subject areas to education for sustainable development–a comparative study of science, social science and language teachers. Environmental Education Research, 26(6), 772–794. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2020.1754341

Susilowati, S., Sajidan, S., & Ramli, M. (2018). Keefektifan perangkat pembelajaran berbasis inquiry lesson untuk meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 22(1), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v22i1.17836

Tafese, M. B., & Kopp, E. (2025). Education for sustainable development: Analyzing research trends in higher education for sustainable development goals through bibliometric analysis. Discover Sustainability, 6, 51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00711-7

Tomas, L., Mills, R., & Gibson, F. (2022). “It’s kind of like a cut and paste of the syllabus”: a teacher’s experience of enacting the Queensland Earth and Environmental Science syllabus, and implications for Education for Sustainable Development. Australian Educational Researcher, 49(2), 445–461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-021-00439-7

Tomas, L., Mills, R., Rigano, D., & Sandhu, M. (2020). Education for sustainable development in the senior Earth and Environmental Science syllabus in Queensland, Australia. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 36(1), 44–62. https://doi.org/10.1017/aee.2020.7

Torbjørnsson, T., Molin, L., & Öhman, J. (2022). The struggle over meaning: Teachers’ negotiations and sense-making about education for sustainable development. Environmental Education Research, 28(1), 114–131.

UNESCO. (2020). Education for Sustainable Development: A Roadmap. Paris: UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000374802

Vare, P., Arro, G., & Varga, A. (2022). Competencies for 21st century sustainability education: A new framework for science educators. Environmental Education Research, 28(3), 373–390.

Vargas-Merino, J. A., Rios-Lama, C. A., & Panez-Bendezú, M. H. (2024). Critical implications of education for sustainable development in HEIs - A systematic review through the lens of the business science literature. International Journal of Management Education, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100904

Voulvoulis, N., Giakoumis, T., Hunt, C., Kioupi, V., Petrou, N., Souliotis, I., et al. (2022). Systems thinking as a paradigm shift for sustainability transformation. Global Environmental Change, 75, 102544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102544

Weinstein, S., Petraglia, M., & Brisbois, B. (2023). Barriers and enablers of Education for Sustainable Development integration in science teaching: A systematic mapping. Sustainability, 15(1), 145.

Zeyer, A. (2022). Teaching Two-Eyed Seeing in Education for Sustainable Development: Inspirations from the Science|Environment|Health Pedagogy in Pandemic Times. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106343

Zeyer, A. (2024). Scientific Holism: A Synoptic (“Two-Eyed Seeing”) Approach to Science Transfer in Education for Sustainable Development, Tested with Pre-Service Teachers. Sustainability (Switzerland) , 16(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16062279

Zguir, M. F., Dubis, S., & Koç, M. (2021). Embedding Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) and SDGs values in curriculum: A comparative review on Qatar, Singapore and New Zealand. Journal of Cleaner Production, 319, 128534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128534

Zhang, T., Shaikh, Z. A., Yumashev, A. V., & Chład, M. (2020). Applied model of E-learning in the framework of education for sustainable development. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12166420

Zidny, R., Solfarina, S., Aisyah, R. S. S., & Eilks, I. (2021). Exploring indigenous science to identify contents and contexts for science learning in order to promote education for sustainable development. Education Sciences, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11030114

Downloads

Published

01-12-2025

How to Cite

Rahmawati, J., Masykuri, M., & Utomo, S. B. (2025). A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis of education for sustainable development integration in science education and its unaddressed gaps. Journal of Environment and Sustainability Education, 3(4), 561–574. https://doi.org/10.62672/joease.v3i4.147

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 4 (2025)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Environment and Sustainability Education

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.